BSI PD IEC/TR 62343-6-5:2011
$142.49
Dynamic modules – Investigation of operating mechanical shock and vibration tests for dynamic modules
| Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
| BSI | 2011 | 24 |
This part of IEC 62343, which is a technical report, explains an investigation of operating mechanical shock and a vibration test for dynamic modules. It also describes the results of a survey, evaluation and mechanical simulation of mechanical shock and vibration testing. This report covers a study of standardization for operating mechanical shock and vibration test methods.
PDF Catalog
| PDF Pages | PDF Title |
|---|---|
| 4 | CONTENTS |
| 6 | FOREWORD |
| 8 | 1 Scope 2 Background 3 Questionnaire results in Japan |
| 9 | 4 Evaluation plan 5 Evaluation results 5.1 Step 1 Figures Figure 1 – Photos of evaluating hammer impact, rack and boards |
| 10 | Figure 2 – Evaluation results of hammer impact H Tables Table 1 – Rack and board specifications, conditions of evaluating hammer impact and acquiring data |
| 11 | 5.2 Step 2 Figure 3 – Photos of evaluating adjacent board insertion and rack handle impact |
| 12 | Figure 4 – DUT (VOA and WSS) installed on boardsand rack for second step of the evaluation Figure 5 – Oscilloscope display of waveform changes in vibration and optical output Table 2 – Dynamic modules used in evaluation and evaluation conditions |
| 13 | 5.3 Step 3 Figure 6 – Evaluation results when employing MEMS-VOA for Z axis |
| 14 | Figure 7 – Photos of the MEMS-VOA shock/vibration test equipment Table 3 – Conditions for MEMS-VOA vibration/shock evaluation |
| 15 | Figure 8 – Operational shock characteristics of MEMS-VOA Figure 9 – Vibration evaluation results for MEMS-VOA (Z axis; 2 G) |
| 16 | Figure 10 – Shock and vibration evaluation system for WSS and tunable laser Table 4 – Results of MEMS-VOA vibration evaluation |
| 17 | Figure 11 – Shock evaluation results for WSS (directional dependence) Figure 12 – Shock evaluation results for WSS (z-axis direction and shock dependence) |
| 18 | 6 Simulation 6.1 Simulation model Figure 13 – Simulation model Table 5 – Conditions for simulating board shock and vibration |
| 19 | 6.2 Frequency characteristics 6.3 Dependence on board design Figure 14 – Vibration simulation results (Conditions: 1,6 mm x 240 mm x 220 mm, t x H x D) |
| 20 | 6.4 Consistency of evaluation and simulation results Figure 15 – Vibration simulation results (Dependence on board conditions) |
| 21 | 7 Summary 8 Conclusions Table 6 – Comparison of hammer impact shock evaluation results and vibration simulation (Conditions: 1,6 mm x 240 mm x 220 mm, t x H x D) |
