BS ISO 22392:2020
$189.07
Security and resilience. Community resilience. Guidelines for conducting peer reviews
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2020 | 46 |
This document gives guidelines for organizations to design, organize, conduct, receive feedback from and learn from a peer review of their disaster risk reduction (DRR) policies and practices. It is also applicable to other community resilience activities. It is intended for use by organizations with the responsibility for, or involvement in, managing such activities including policy and preparedness, response and recovery operations, and designing preventative measures (e.g. for the effects of environmental changes such as those from climate change).
It is applicable to all types, structures and sizes of organizations, such as local, regional and national governments, statutory bodies, non-governmental organizations, businesses, and public and community groups. It is applicable before or after an incident or exercise.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
7 | Foreword |
8 | Introduction |
11 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
12 | 4 Plan the peer review 4.1 General |
13 | 4.2 Decide the level of administration to be peer reviewed 4.3 Agree the expected benefits of the peer review 4.4 Agree the objectives of the peer review |
14 | 4.5 Agree the high-level timeline for the peer review 4.6 Decide whether a self-assessment will be completed before the peer review 4.7 Consider the cost/benefit of hosting the peer review |
15 | 4.8 Identify parties who are interested in the peer review 4.9 Select the analysis areas to be peer reviewed 4.10 Appoint an organization to coordinate the peer review 4.11 Agree the terms of the peer review |
16 | 4.12 Select personnel from the host to provide information to the reviewers 4.13 Appoint reviewers |
17 | 5 Conduct the peer review 5.1 General 5.2 Identify the attributes of conducting the peer review |
18 | 5.3 Plan the peer review process |
19 | 5.4 Prepare personnel to provide information to reviewers 5.5 Provide information to reviewers about each analysis area 5.5.1 General |
20 | 5.5.2 Information on the strategy, vision and leadership for each analysis area 5.5.3 Information on the collection and use of intelligence for each analysis area 5.5.4 Information on the management of processes, systems, planning and audits for each analysis area |
21 | 5.5.5 Information on the coordination and communication of operations for each analysis area 5.5.6 Information on the delivery of operations for each analysis area 5.6 Prepare and ask questions about each analysis area 5.7 Record observations and views about each analysis area |
22 | 5.8 Analyse the information and form an opinion about each analysis area 5.9 Deliver consolidated feedback on each analysis area 6 Assess the impact of the peer review 6.1 General |
23 | 6.2 Assess impact during the peer review 6.3 Assess impact after the peer review 6.3.1 General 6.3.2 Assess impact on practice using a quantitative approach |
24 | 6.3.3 Assess impact on practice using a qualitative approach 7 Improve the process of the peer review 7.1 General 7.2 Identify improvements to the peer review process |
25 | 7.3 Identify improvements to how the impact of the peer review process is assessed |
26 | Annex A (informative) Example tasks to be conducted before, during and after the peer review visit |
27 | Annex B (informative) Descriptions of analysis areas to be peer reviewed |
35 | Annex C (informative) Example of an evidence-recording template |
41 | Annex D (informative) Example peer review visit timetable |
43 | Annex E (informative) Generic discussion points and questions to ask about each analysis area |
44 | Annex F (informative) Example form for reviewer to record information |
45 | Bibliography |