Shopping Cart

No products in the cart.

BS ISO 22392:2020

$189.07

Security and resilience. Community resilience. Guidelines for conducting peer reviews

Published By Publication Date Number of Pages
BSI 2020 46
Guaranteed Safe Checkout
Categories: ,

If you have any questions, feel free to reach out to our online customer service team by clicking on the bottom right corner. We’re here to assist you 24/7.
Email:[email protected]

This document gives guidelines for organizations to design, organize, conduct, receive feedback from and learn from a peer review of their disaster risk reduction (DRR) policies and practices. It is also applicable to other community resilience activities. It is intended for use by organizations with the responsibility for, or involvement in, managing such activities including policy and preparedness, response and recovery operations, and designing preventative measures (e.g. for the effects of environmental changes such as those from climate change).

It is applicable to all types, structures and sizes of organizations, such as local, regional and national governments, statutory bodies, non-governmental organizations, businesses, and public and community groups. It is applicable before or after an incident or exercise.

PDF Catalog

PDF Pages PDF Title
2 undefined
7 Foreword
8 Introduction
11 1 Scope
2 Normative references
3 Terms and definitions
12 4 Plan the peer review
4.1 General
13 4.2 Decide the level of administration to be peer reviewed
4.3 Agree the expected benefits of the peer review
4.4 Agree the objectives of the peer review
14 4.5 Agree the high-level timeline for the peer review
4.6 Decide whether a self-assessment will be completed before the peer review
4.7 Consider the cost/benefit of hosting the peer review
15 4.8 Identify parties who are interested in the peer review
4.9 Select the analysis areas to be peer reviewed
4.10 Appoint an organization to coordinate the peer review
4.11 Agree the terms of the peer review
16 4.12 Select personnel from the host to provide information to the reviewers
4.13 Appoint reviewers
17 5 Conduct the peer review
5.1 General
5.2 Identify the attributes of conducting the peer review
18 5.3 Plan the peer review process
19 5.4 Prepare personnel to provide information to reviewers
5.5 Provide information to reviewers about each analysis area
5.5.1 General
20 5.5.2 Information on the strategy, vision and leadership for each analysis area
5.5.3 Information on the collection and use of intelligence for each analysis area
5.5.4 Information on the management of processes, systems, planning and audits for each analysis area
21 5.5.5 Information on the coordination and communication of operations for each analysis area
5.5.6 Information on the delivery of operations for each analysis area
5.6 Prepare and ask questions about each analysis area
5.7 Record observations and views about each analysis area
22 5.8 Analyse the information and form an opinion about each analysis area
5.9 Deliver consolidated feedback on each analysis area
6 Assess the impact of the peer review
6.1 General
23 6.2 Assess impact during the peer review
6.3 Assess impact after the peer review
6.3.1 General
6.3.2 Assess impact on practice using a quantitative approach
24 6.3.3 Assess impact on practice using a qualitative approach
7 Improve the process of the peer review
7.1 General
7.2 Identify improvements to the peer review process
25 7.3 Identify improvements to how the impact of the peer review process is assessed
26 Annex A (informative) Example tasks to be conducted before, during and after the peer review visit
27 Annex B (informative) Descriptions of analysis areas to be peer reviewed
35 Annex C (informative) Example of an evidence-recording template
41 Annex D (informative) Example peer review visit timetable
43 Annex E (informative) Generic discussion points and questions to ask about each analysis area
44 Annex F (informative) Example form for reviewer to record information
45 Bibliography
BS ISO 22392:2020
$189.07