BS EN IEC 62822-3:2023 – TC
$280.87
Tracked Changes. Electric welding equipment. Assessment of restrictions related to human exposure to electromagnetic fields (0 Hz to 300 Hz) – Resistance welding equipment
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2023 | 194 |
IEC 62822-3:2023 applies to equipment for resistance welding and allied processes designed for occupational use by professionals and for use by laymen. More generally, this document covers equipment for which the welding current flows in an electrical circuit whose geometry cannot be changed and regardless of the technology of the current generator (for example LF-AC, MF-DC for spot or seam welding or capacitive discharge used for stud welding). This second edition cancels and replaces the first edition published in 2017. This edition constitutes a technical revision. This edition includes the following significant technical changes with respect to the previous edition: a) inclusion of the uncertainties in the results of the assessment; b) simplification of the methods of exposure assessment.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
122 | undefined |
125 | Annex ZA (normative)Normative references to international publicationswith their corresponding European publications |
126 | English CONTENTS |
130 | FOREWORD |
132 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references |
133 | 3 Terms, definitions, quantities, units, constants and symbols 3.1 Terms and definitions |
135 | 3.2 Quantities and units 3.3 Constants |
136 | 3.4 Symbols 4 Requirements |
137 | 5 Assessment methods 5.1 General 5.2 Methods based on reference levels 5.2.1 General |
138 | 5.2.2 Assessment based on measured magnetic field |
139 | Figures Figure 1 – Exposure measurement at the head position Figure 2 – Exposure measurement at trunk position |
140 | 5.2.3 Assessment based on measured welding current Figure 3 – Exposure measurement at limb positions (hands and thigh) |
142 | 5.3 Methods based on assessment of corporal quantities (basic restrictions) 5.3.1 General Figure 4 – Compliance perimeters according to reference levels (action levels) |
143 | 5.3.2 Method based on coupling coefficients |
145 | 5.3.3 Method based on the correction factor Figure 5 – Compliance perimeters according to basic restrictions(exposure limit values) |
146 | 5.3.4 Method based on the human model simulation |
147 | Figure 6 – Magnetic field around the human body obtained by source modelling |
148 | 5.3.5 Result comparison 6 Measurement considerations 6.1 Measurement instruments for magnetic fields or exposure levels 6.1.1 General Figure 7 – Example of induced electric field in a human bodyexposed to a welding gun (I = 1kA to 50 Hz) |
149 | 6.1.2 Probe(s) 6.1.3 Handheld field meter 6.1.4 Measurement system with separate elements |
150 | 6.2 Instruments for recording 6.2.1 Welding current recording 6.2.2 Magnetic field recording |
151 | 6.3 Signal processing (applicable to any welding current waveform) 6.3.1 General 6.3.2 Application of the weighted peak method in the time domain 6.3.3 Spatial averaging 6.3.4 Time averaging 6.4 Uncertainty of assessment |
152 | 7 Computational assessment methods 7.1 General 7.2 Quasi-static approximation 7.3 Human body models for simulation |
153 | 7.4 Computational assessment against the basic restrictions Tables Table 1 – Examples of human models to determine inducedelectric fields in the low frequency range |
154 | 8 Source model 8.1 General 8.2 Source model example |
155 | Figure 8 – Welding current flowing in a (a × b) rectangular loop configuration |
156 | 9 EMF data sheet and assessment report |
158 | Annex A (informative)Example of assessment based on the individual components A.1 General A.2 Welding current generator Figure A.1 – Assessment of a complete welding system Figure A.2 – Typical component based assessment |
159 | Figure A.3 – LF-AC (left) and MF-DC (right) current waveforms Figure A.4 – Combined ELV for the sensory and health effects applicable to the head |
160 | Figure A.5 – Current exposure indices over the time for two welding technologies Table A.1 – Current exposure index for LF-AC technology (Irms = 11,4 kA) Table A.2 – GP current exposure index for LF-AC technology (Irms = 11,4 kA) |
161 | A.3 Coupling coefficient of welding circuit Figure A.6 – Geometry of the stationary spot welding gun Figure A.7 – Welding electric circuit model (in m)and one point of interest along the X axis |
162 | A.4 Welding-system Figure A.8 – Coupling coefficient CCBI along the X axis Figure A.9 – Exposure index (AL) along the X axis |
163 | Figure A.10 – Exposure index (ELV) along the X axis |
164 | Annex B (informative)Example datasheets B.1 Example current generator datasheet Figure B.1 – Example datasheet of the power source |
165 | B.2 Example datasheet of the welding circuit Figure B.2 – Example datasheet of the electrode assembly |
166 | B.3 Example datasheets of equipment assembly Figure B.3 – Datasheet example of the welding system |
167 | Figure B.4 – Example datasheet of the welding system (continuation) |
168 | Figure B.5 – Example datasheet of the welding system (continuation) |
169 | Annex C (informative)Coupling coefficient method C.1 Principle C.2 Validation of this method C.2.1 Context Table C.1 – Representative disk radius (geometric model) |
170 | C.2.2 Basic restriction against health effects C.2.3 Basic restriction against sensory effects Figure C.1 – Distribution of human to disk model exposure index ratios (health effects of ELV on trunk and hands) |
171 | C.3 Conclusion Figure C.2 – Distribution of human to disk model exposure index ratios(sensory and health effects of ELV on the head) Table C.2 – Coupling coefficients |
173 | Annex D (informative)Correction factor method D.1 General D.2 Principle |
174 | D.3 Example of correction factor finding D.3.1 Context D.3.2 Correction factor for the trunk and limbs D.3.3 Correction factor for the head Figure D.1 – Distribution of correction factor kE for health effects on trunk and hands |
175 | D.4 Conclusion Figure D.2 – Distribution of correction factor kE for effects on the head (sensory and health) |
176 | Annex E (informative)Example of exposure assessments on a welding machine E.1 General E.2 Description of the spot welding workstation E.3 Exposure conditions |
177 | Figure E.1 – Welding gun and its electric circuit model (yellow dash segments) Figure E.2 – Magnetic field distribution around the exposed body |
178 | E.4 Main simulation parameters and results E.4.1 Main simulation parameters Figure E.3 – Configuration and electric field distribution on the exposed body (for 1 kA at f = 50 Hz) Figure E.4 – Electric field distribution on hands (for 1 kA at f = 50 Hz) |
179 | E.4.2 Simulation results E.5 Exposure assessments E.5.1 General E.5.2 Method based on magnetic field calculation E.5.3 Method based on coupling coefficients Table E.1 – Coupling coefficients for the magnetic field and on human model Table E.2 – Results based on magnetic field calculation |
180 | E.5.4 Method based on the correction factor E.5.5 Method based on the human model Table E.3 – Results based on coupling coefficients Table E.4 – Results based on the correction factor Table E.5 – Results based on human model |
181 | E.6 Conclusion |
182 | Annex F (informative)Computational methods F.1 General F.2 SPFD method F.3 Quasi-static – Finite element method |
183 | F.4 Impedance method |
184 | F.5 Hybrid technique of FEM and SPFD method F.6 Computation of the magnetic vector potential |
186 | Annex G (informative)Averaging algorithms G.1 Current density averaging over an area G.1.1 General G.1.2 Calculation of the current density in a Cartesian voxel |
187 | G.1.3 Calculation of the current density in a tetrahedron G.1.4 Calculation of Javg Figure G.1 – Field components on voxel edges |
188 | G.2 E-field averaging in a cubical volume G.3 E-field averaging along an averaging distance G.3.1 General |
189 | G.3.2 Algorithm to construct the integration path |
190 | Annex H (informative)Correspondence table between time domain and frequency domain Table H.1 – Transcription of formulae |
192 | Bibliography |