BS EN 50527-2-3:2021
$227.44
Procedure for the assessment of the exposure to electromagnetic fields of workers bearing active implantable medical devices – Specific assessment for workers with implantable neurostimulators
Published By | Publication Date | Number of Pages |
BSI | 2021 | 110 |
This document provides the procedure for the specific assessment required in EN 50527‑1:2016, Annex A, for workers with implanted neurostimulator systems (NS), specifically of the type used for spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
It is recognized that implantable neurostimulators have been developed for a wide variety of clinical applications, however the SCS devices within the scope of this document represent the largest segment of the implantable neurostimulator applications thus far.
NOTE 1 If the worker has other Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMDs) implanted additionally, they are assessed separately according to EN 50527‑1 or other particular standards within the EN 50527 series .
The purpose of the specific assessment is to determine the risk for workers with implanted SCS devices arising from exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) at the workplace. The assessment includes the likelihood of clinically significant effects.
NOTE 2 This document does not address risks from contact currents, or the effects upon any associated non-implantable devices (e.g. Patient Programmers).
The techniques described in the different approaches can also be used for the assessment of publicly accessible areas.
The frequency range to be observed is from 0 Hz to 3 GHz. Above 3 GHz no interference with the devices within the scope of this document is expected to occur.
NOTE 3 The rationale for limiting the observation range to 3 GHz can be found in ISO 14708‑3 [1].
NOTE 4 Further information concerning the functions of neurostimulator systems can be found at /2.
This document provides the procedure for the specific assessment required in EN 50527‑1:2016, Annex A, for workers with implanted neurostimulator systems (NS), specifically of the type used for spinal cord stimulation (SCS).
It is recognized that implantable neurostimulators have been developed for a wide variety of clinical applications, however the SCS devices within the scope of this document represent the largest segment of the implantable neurostimulator applications thus far.
NOTE 1 If the worker has other Active Implantable Medical Devices (AIMDs) implanted additionally, they are assessed separately according to EN 50527‑1 or other particular standards within the EN 50527 series .
The purpose of the specific assessment is to determine the risk for workers with implanted SCS devices arising from exposure to electromagnetic fields (EMF) at the workplace. The assessment includes the likelihood of clinically significant effects.
NOTE 2 This document does not address risks from contact currents, or the effects upon any associated non-implantable devices (e.g. Patient Programmers).
The techniques described in the different approaches can also be used for the assessment of publicly accessible areas.
The frequency range to be observed is from 0 Hz to 3 GHz. Above 3 GHz no interference with the devices within the scope of this document is expected to occur.
NOTE 3 The rationale for limiting the observation range to 3 GHz can be found in ISO 14708‑3 [1].
NOTE 4 Further information concerning the functions of neurostimulator systems can be found at /2.
PDF Catalog
PDF Pages | PDF Title |
---|---|
2 | undefined |
9 | 1 Scope 2 Normative references 3 Terms and definitions |
11 | 4 Specific assessment 4.1 Overview of specific assessments 4.1.1 Relation to OH&S Management Systems 4.1.2 Description of the assessment process |
14 | 4.2 Specific assessment phase 0: Exclusion based on history and physician warnings |
15 | 4.3 Specific assessment phase 1: Consideration of equipment and SCS therapy type |
17 | 4.4 Specific assessment phase 2a – workplace EMF compared to Action Levels |
19 | 4.5 Overview of specific assessment phases 2b and 2c |
20 | 4.6 Methodology for assessment of unintended nerve stimulation and tissue damage risk 4.6.1 General 4.6.2 Overview of the assessment method given in Annexes D and E |
21 | 4.6.3 Selection of device parameters for assessment 4.6.4 Assessment levels for electric and magnetic fields |
25 | 4.6.5 NSR and TDR calculation results for unipolar and bipolar configurations |
28 | 4.6.6 Phase 2a risk assessment summary |
29 | 4.7 Specific Assessment phase 2b – workplace EMF compared to NSR / TDR EMF threshold levels 4.7.1 Phase 2b general approach 4.7.2 EMF threshold zones |
31 | 4.7.3 Conversion of EMF values 4.7.4 Phase 2b assessment procedure |
41 | 4.8 Specific assessment phase 2c – adjustments for known lead characteristics 4.8.1 Phase 2c general approach |
43 | 4.8.2 Phase 2c assessment procedure |
44 | 5 Documentation |
45 | Annex A (normative)Device specific replacement of EN 505271:2016, Table 1 |
49 | Annex B (informative)Rationale B.1 Introduction B.2 Rationale for specific clauses of this document |
50 | Annex C (informative)Nerve Stimulation for SCS C.1 Neurostimulation techniques C.1.1 Types of neurostimulators and their usage C.2 Spinal Cord Stimulation C.2.1 The main features of SCS |
51 | C.2.2 SCS leads and stimulation methods C.2.2.1 General C.2.2.2 Unipolar stimulation |
52 | C.2.2.3 Bipolar stimulation using one lead C.2.2.4 Bipolar stimulation using two leads C.2.2.5 When leads are longer than is needed C.2.2.6 Wire diameters C.2.3 Electrodes for SCS C.2.3.1 General |
53 | C.2.3.2 Cylindrical electrodes C.2.3.3 Paddle electrodes C.2.4 Summary of dimensions C.2.5 Implantation of electrodes |
54 | C.2.6 Dura to spinal cord distances |
55 | C.2.7 Connections to the IPG |
56 | Annex D (informative)Selection of Conductivity Values for SCS Modelling D.1 The use of conductivity in the standard D.2 Conductivity literature D.2.1 1996 data |
57 | D.2.2 Subsequent developments D.2.2.1 Overview of subsequent developments D.2.2.2 Gabriel et al. 2009; frequencies below 1 MHz |
58 | D.2.2.3 Peyman and Gabriel 2010; Cole-Cole parameters for microwave frequencies D.2.2.4 Peyman et al. 2007; porcine cerebrospinal tissues at microwave frequencies |
61 | D.3 Selection of values for tissue Types D.3.1 General D.3.2 Fat |
63 | D.3.3 Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and spinal cord (nerve) D.3.4 Cerebrospinal tissues D.3.4.1 Physiology |
64 | D.3.4.2 Combining conductivities for cerebrospinal tissues |
65 | D.3.4.3 Combined conductivity in region between electrodes and spinal cord |
66 | D.3.4.4 Conductivity for determining electric field at electrodes from external electric field |
67 | D.4 Summary |
68 | Annex E (informative)Modelling Nerve Stimulation for SCS E.1 Introduction E.1.1 General E.1.2 Literature E.1.3 Elementary representation |
70 | E.1.4 Detailed model E.1.4.1 General |
72 | E.1.4.2 The SENN computer model |
73 | E.1.5 Application of the SENN Computer Model |
74 | E.1.6 Effect of altering separation between electrode and nerve |
75 | E.1.7 Electrode Factor for point-electrodes E.1.7.1 General E.1.7.2 For one point-electrode in isotropic tissue |
77 | E.1.7.3 For one point-electrode in non-isotropic tissue |
78 | E.1.7.4 Electrode Factor for two point-electrodes in isotropic tissue |
79 | E.1.7.5 Electrode factor for actual electrodes E.1.8 Stimulation from internal electric field |
82 | E.2 Internal electric field threshold for nerve stimulation E.2.1 General |
84 | E.2.2 Stimulation at higher levels of in situ electric field E.2.3 Overview of method for assessing whether nerve stimulation occurs E.3 Avoiding damage to tissue E.3.1 General |
85 | E.3.2 Assessment of localized SAR E.3.2.1 General E.3.2.2 At electrode surface |
86 | E.3.2.3 Allowing for the averaging volume |
87 | E.3.2.4 Relationship with ICNIRP reference levels for contact current E.3.3 Overview of method for assessing whether tissue damage might occur |
88 | E.4 Assessment of voltages and currents induced in leads E.4.1 Voltages induced by magnetic fields E.4.1.1 The voltage calculation E.4.1.2 The current calculation E.4.1.3 Selection of loop areas A E.4.1.4 Magnetic field assessment levels, B E.4.1.5 Magnetic field exposure levels used for assessment |
90 | E.4.1.6 Calculated voltages |
91 | E.4.2 Voltages and currents induced by electric fields E.4.2.1 General E.4.2.2 Low frequencies (<10 MHz) |
92 | E.4.2.3 Radio frequencies (thermal effects) |
93 | E.4.2.4 Selection of electrode separation, L E.4.2.5 Selection of electric field assessment levels |
94 | E.4.2.6 Calculated voltages |
95 | E.5 Assessment of nerve stimulation from external fields E.5.1 Method for assessing nerve stimulation risk |
96 | E.5.2 Nerve stimulation from magnetic fields E.5.2.1 General |
97 | E.5.2.2 Conclusions on nerve stimulation from magnetic fields |
98 | E.5.3 Nerve stimulation from electric fields E.5.3.1 Full nerve stimulation assessment results for electric field induction |
99 | E.5.3.2 Conclusions on nerve stimulation from electric fields E.6 Assessment of tissue damage from external fields E.6.1 Method for assessing tissue damage risk |
100 | E.6.2 Tissue Damage from magnetic fields E.6.2.1 General E.6.2.2 Conclusions on tissue damage from magnetic fields |
101 | E.6.3 Tissue Damage from electric fields E.6.3.1 General E.6.3.2 Conclusions on tissue damage from electric fields |
102 | E.7 Overall assessment |
103 | Annex F (informative)Electrode factor for non-isotropic tissue F.1 Application to isotropic tissue |
105 | F.2 Application to non-isotropic tissue |